various audiences on various occasions. This alone can account for certain differences in language, style, and theological argument. Stylistic analysis is useful only when distinct documents have (roughly) the same audience and subject in view. Finally, Paul’s letters were written over a period of years, while the apostle himself and the churches he served were changing. Paul was no static leader. His was a dynamic church. Although development is hard to track and one must be careful not to draw
Page 9